When Loyalty Collides with Leadership: How Owners Make the Hard Call (and Keep Their Culture Intact)
Like what you see? Consider subscribing to get the latest articles here.
Most construction owners eventually face a tough reality: one of the people who helped you build the company—a family member, a longtime lieutenant, or a day-one friend—no longer fits the culture.
In many cases, their attitude is old-school and they simply can’t get themselves to accept the obvious reality: the company has changed, new generations are here, and the culture is different than it used to be.
It may not be their fault. A company that doubles, then doubles again, changes how leadership must behave and the types of leaders you will need to be successful. Unfortunately, your most loyal person may not—or won’t—change with it.
The way you handle this situation will have massive impacts on your culture.
Two silent culture killers
Executive leadership has a disproportional impact on the culture of the rest of the company. In short, whatever your top leaders do, the company will follow.
So, when an executive leader underperforms on integrity, standards, or teamwork, everyone else in the company notices and draws conclusions:
“To get ahead here, I need to act like that.” You accidentally incentivize jerk behavior and create a brittle, political culture.
“I don’t want to work here.” Your best people disengage or leave because they won’t attach their identity to low-integrity leadership.
Both outcomes erode long-term strategy. They slow down decisions, disincentivize innovative thinking, and drive avoidable conflict throughout the organization. Execution suffers first, then results follow.
The owner’s work: look without excuses
Owners must do the hardest, most loving thing leaders do: see clearly. Remove the “but they’ve been with me since we were in a one-window office days” filter. Judge the role against today’s cultural standards, not yesterday’s storms you weathered together.
Ask three clarifying questions:
Desire: Do they have any interest in making a change in themselves that will fit into the current state of the organization?
Character: Do peers and teams experience them as fair, honest, and constructive—especially under pressure?
Consistency: Do they model the standard when no one is watching?
If you can’t say “yes” to all three, you owe your people a decision.
Four paths forward (in order of preference)
If you do have someone on your executive team perpetuating this kind of behavior, you have no choice but to address it. You cannot continue making excuses for them.
Start with having the hard conversation. “I know everything you’ve done for us, and I’ll be forever grateful for that. And I also know that we can’t have someone leading our organization who is eroding the culture, so we need to have a real conversation about what it looks like to get you to a better place where you’re helping us get to where we want to go.”
There are four major outcomes you may experience:
1) They admit they are a problem and are open to change
This is the ideal.
The tough conversation breaks through their tough facade and gets them reflecting on the changes they need to make.
If you get this response, everything will likely be okay. Your job is then to simply run an intense, time-based improvement plan (60–90 days). Define three to five non-negotiable behaviors tied to role outcomes. Example: “No public blowups,” “Direct reports have weekly 1-1 coaching,” “No demeaning people.”
Why it works: You give a fair shot and a concrete runway. If they change, you keep institutional wisdom and a better teammate.
Non-negotiable: Feedback delivered fast—whether good or bad—and communicated clearly and directly. If they miss the mark twice on the same behavior, escalate consequences.
2) They get it, but are not willing to make a change. And losing them would crush the business
Sometimes, they will know they are a problem, yet are not capable or willing to make a change in themselves. Meanwhile, they are such experts at what they do; losing them would be extremely detrimental to the business.
If they’re gold on technical knowledge but poor with people, remove all direct reports and reposition them as a subject matter expert. Put them off to the side in the organization, let them add the immense value they add, but don’t give them executive leadership responsibilities. Don’t let their cultural rot spread.
Why it works: You protect culture while honoring their strengths.
Guardrail: No shadow management. The SME cannot backseat drive teams.
3) They can’t admit they are a problem and are not willing to change. And the subject matter expert route won’t work.
Sometimes, the value they add as a subject matter expert will be outweighed by just how bad they are for your culture.
So, if they can’t or won’t change, as hard as it will be, you need to end your professional relationship. But you are allowed to end it well. You can come to a mutual agreement that this won’t work, and make a commitment to them that you will work with them on a plan to offboard them with grace. Celebrate their history. Tell the truth about their contributions. Be generous and humane. Keep your word in separation terms.
Why it works: Everyone watches how you treat people on the way out. A clean, respectful exit raises trust.
Owner script (short): “We wouldn’t be here without you. The role we need now is different. We’ll honor your impact and help you land well.”
4) They won’t make a change in themselves, but you can’t lose them right now.
Finally, you may make your best efforts to have the tough conversation, but it doesn’t stick, and you can’t move on from them yet. They are running a few key projects and losing them right now would be detrimental.
If that’s the case, install a strong operator between them and the org (e.g., a Director under a legacy VP) to shield the team. Use this only as a bridge with a defined end date in mind. Get through those last few projects, then mutually part ways.
Why it works (sometimes): Buys time for the real decision while still taking action to shield the organization.
Reality check: Success rates are lower. Without a defined end date, this becomes avoidance disguised as “what we need to do right now”.
A note to owners who care deeply about people
Choosing culture over relationship is not disloyalty. It’s stewardship. Your high-integrity people are deciding whether to bet their careers on your company. Show them you’ll protect the standard—even when it’s personal.
If the best case happens, your longtime lieutenant grows into the next chapter. If not, honor them and move decisively. Either way, you demonstrate what your company stands for.
Spark Notes:
Every growing contractor eventually faces a painful truth: someone who helped build the company no longer fits the culture required to lead it.
When owners tolerate executive-level behavior that violates today’s standards, the rest of the company follows—either by copying it or by disengaging.
Leadership means looking clearly at desire, character, and consistency, then choosing one of four paths that protect culture without rewriting history.
Choosing culture over comfort isn’t betrayal—it’s stewardship of the people betting their careers on your company.
